|
Post by Michele on Apr 12, 2009 23:02:02 GMT -5
I'm bored, so I came up with this new game for NCIS.
Come up with crazy plots for episodes.
like this.
a UFO comes and takes Palmer away.
|
|
|
Post by mari on Apr 19, 2009 17:00:43 GMT -5
I'm bored, so I came up with this new game for NCIS. Come up with crazy plots for episodes. like this. a UFO comes and takes Palmer away. They make some crazy, brain-operating experiments and finally transform him into a doppelgänger of Gibbs who is addicted to peppermint tea and hugs people instead of slapping their heads. (Is this what you had in mind? ;D )
|
|
|
Post by Michele on Apr 19, 2009 20:12:16 GMT -5
yeah, thats what I had in mind
|
|
|
Post by dzero on Apr 19, 2009 21:27:47 GMT -5
How bout an episode where Tony turns to Palmer for advice...what could be crazier than that? ;D oh, wait
|
|
|
Post by Michele on Apr 19, 2009 22:17:32 GMT -5
lol dzero Palmer becomes the director of NCIS Gibbs joins the FBI Tony becomes a actor and meets Jessica Alba McGee is still a writer Ziva joins a band Abby goes with Ziva and joins the band They sing the song for Tony's movie Ducky still talks to the dead Agent Lee comes back from the dead Agent Sacks is Tony's co-star Fornell joins NCIS Kort is the director of the ATF Mike Franks runs a day care need to think of some more
|
|
|
Post by shywriter on Apr 20, 2009 0:18:39 GMT -5
need to think of some more I still vote for one of those over-the-top, angsty, Tony-turning-into-a-weepy-six-year-old-because-of-Daddy-issues fics on FFN ... and then make him pregnant. I swear, with all those wacky fics parading around in my head (I can't get 'em out once they're stuck in there!!) I can't think of one original crazy idea for the game that isn't just tame by comparison...
|
|
|
Post by Michele on Apr 20, 2009 2:05:50 GMT -5
lol Shywriter, there are alot of Mpreg storys out there and they all seen to be Tony that is Pregnant. and its not always gibbs is the other father, there is even one with Palmer as the father.
But I guess it don't help when in one episode Tony told Ziva he was Pregnant.
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Clark on Apr 20, 2009 2:31:08 GMT -5
Shy your fixation with MPreg writing is starting to get to me. I was able to suppress my gag reflex and express a logical opinion on why it occurs but I can only sustain so much. Not to mention your level of fixation on this subject is kind of strange.
|
|
|
Post by mari on Apr 20, 2009 3:15:14 GMT -5
need to think of some more I still vote for one of those over-the-top, angsty, Tony-turning-into-a-weepy-six-year-old-because-of-Daddy-issues fics on FFN ... and then make him pregnant. Wouldn’t that make more sense the other way round, he is a emotional six year old just because he’s pregnant, hormones and all? ;D
|
|
|
Post by shywriter on Apr 20, 2009 21:13:33 GMT -5
Shy your fixation with MPreg writing is starting to get to me. I was able to suppress my gag reflex and express a logical opinion on why it occurs but I can only sustain so much. Not to mention your level of fixation on this subject is kind of strange. Ah, Mr. Clark, forgive me for not taking your opinion as the final word on the topic, clearly offered at your great personal discomfort, but my “level of fixation” seems to demand more than only your reaction to satisfy that “strange” compulsion you suggest that I have. We here at DAR are a dwindling group of those with some, but not completely, shared interests. I doubt that even one member is interested in 100% of all topics posted, or agrees with 100% of opinions expressed. But at least since the great S1/S2 schism that predated us both, it has been pretty much live and let live around here. We share the tacit understanding that if you don’t want to read something, you just go on to the next post. A recent exception to that was the flurry of upset about DAR’s non-S2 policy and the auto-censor in play. A small flock of talented writers left in its wake, and left us with an even smaller, quieter group of participants on this board. Whether or not it was warranted or reasonable, their leaving was the direct result of censorship, which has left us a little poorer for it. Now you suggest, indirectly, that because you personally take offense at a joking reference to a fanfic phenomenon, it should no longer be mentioned. Moreover, you do so by publicly impugning my wholesome, squeaky clean image, not to mention what’s left of my mental health. Might I suggest that, in all the ways one might ask someone to scale back on the discussion of a topic, a public pronouncement that the person’s interest is purulent, even pathological, is probably at the lower end of the 'successful' list? If it comes up again, it’s okay if you just pass by without expressing a logical (or other sort of) opinion. We get it.
|
|
|
Post by Aerie on Apr 20, 2009 22:40:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dzero on Apr 20, 2009 22:47:40 GMT -5
Shy your fixation with MPreg writing is starting to get to me. I was able to suppress my gag reflex and express a logical opinion on why it occurs but I can only sustain so much. Not to mention your level of fixation on this subject is kind of strange. Ah, Mr. Clark, forgive me for not taking your opinion as the final word on the topic, clearly offered at your great personal discomfort, but my “level of fixation” seems to demand more than only your reaction to satisfy that “strange” compulsion you suggest that I have. We here at DAR are a dwindling group of those with some, but not completely, shared interests. I doubt that even one member is interested in 100% of all topics posted, or agrees with 100% of opinions expressed. But at least since the great S1/S2 schism that predated us both, it has been pretty much live and let live around here. We share the tacit understanding that if you don’t want to read something, you just go on to the next post. A recent exception to that was the flurry of upset about DAR’s non-S2 policy and the auto-censor in play. A small flock of talented writers left in its wake, and left us with an even smaller, quieter group of participants on this board. Whether or not it was warranted or reasonable, their leaving was the direct result of censorship, which has left us a little poorer for it. Now you suggest, indirectly, that because you personally take offense at a joking reference to a fanfic phenomenon, it should no longer be mentioned. Moreover, you do so by publicly impugning my wholesome, squeaky clean image, not to mention what’s left of my mental health. Might I suggest that, in all the ways one might ask someone to scale back on the discussion of a topic, a public pronouncement that the person’s interest is purulent, even pathological, is probably at the lower end of the 'successful' list? If it comes up again, it’s okay if you just pass by without expressing a logical (or other sort of) opinion. We get it. We are dwindling?
|
|
|
Post by Aerie on Apr 20, 2009 23:20:53 GMT -5
Yes, we dwindled.
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Clark on Apr 21, 2009 0:35:42 GMT -5
Shy your fixation with MPreg writing is starting to get to me. I was able to suppress my gag reflex and express a logical opinion on why it occurs but I can only sustain so much. Not to mention your level of fixation on this subject is kind of strange. Ah, Mr. Clark, forgive me for not taking your opinion as the final word on the topic, clearly offered at your great personal discomfort, but my “level of fixation” seems to demand more than only your reaction to satisfy that “strange” compulsion you suggest that I have. We here at DAR are a dwindling group of those with some, but not completely, shared interests. I doubt that even one member is interested in 100% of all topics posted, or agrees with 100% of opinions expressed. But at least since the great S1/S2 schism that predated us both, it has been pretty much live and let live around here. We share the tacit understanding that if you don’t want to read something, you just go on to the next post. A recent exception to that was the flurry of upset about DAR’s non-S2 policy and the auto-censor in play. A small flock of talented writers left in its wake, and left us with an even smaller, quieter group of participants on this board. Whether or not it was warranted or reasonable, their leaving was the direct result of censorship, which has left us a little poorer for it. Now you suggest, indirectly, that because you personally take offense at a joking reference to a fanfic phenomenon, it should no longer be mentioned. Moreover, you do so by publicly impugning my wholesome, squeaky clean image, not to mention what’s left of my mental health. Might I suggest that, in all the ways one might ask someone to scale back on the discussion of a topic, a public pronouncement that the person’s interest is purulent, even pathological, is probably at the lower end of the 'successful' list? If it comes up again, it’s okay if you just pass by without expressing a logical (or other sort of) opinion. We get it. Before we start citing the First Amendment I was not trying to force my opinion and points of view on the board. My intent was to express my opinion (which could be considered whining, I have been known to whine about things) on the fact that I find the topic rather repulsive. Since I posted my thoughts on the nature of the phenomenon I have for the most part avoided the discussion because as I said, I do find it repulsive. The intent of the post you cited was to remark with a small amount of amusement that you've taken to this topic rather like fascinated psychology student, intent on examining the subject in detail so that one could document its causes and treatments. I also now see that the subtlety of my amusement didn't translate well in the text I provided. However feel free to keep taking me from pillar to post as Aerie seems to enjoy it when my incoherent nonsense gets, often rightfully, beaten like a rented mule.
|
|
|
Post by dzero on Apr 21, 2009 0:44:39 GMT -5
[ The intent of the post you cited was to remark with a small amount of amusement that you've taken to this topic rather like fascinated psychology student, intent on examining the subject in detail so that one could document its causes and treatments. I also now see that the subtlety of my amusement didn't translate well in the text I provided. yeah that's how I understood the post, maybe it's a guy thing
|
|